| From: | Krasiyan Andreev <krasiyan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Implement <null treatment> for window functions |
| Date: | 2020-11-21 09:07:09 |
| Message-ID: | CAN1Pwom708Q8cgBSnX92xmhK56upU1M0peZs9uiSqjHKXFXNXQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fixed patch attached, after new introduced conflicts.
Vik, can you add it to the next commitfest, to be able to test it.
Also, all tests from Oliver Ford's old patch also passed successfully.
На пт, 13.11.2020 г. в 0:44 ч. Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> написа:
> On 11/12/20 11:35 PM, Krasiyan Andreev wrote:
> > Hi, it looks like Vik Fearing's patch does not apply anymore, because
> there
> > are many conflicts with recent changes, fixed patch attached.
>
> Thanks! I've been away from this list for a while and I have some
> catching up to do.
> --
> Vik Fearing
>
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-implement-null-treatment-for-window-functions.patch | text/x-patch | 62.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-11-21 10:50:05 | Re: Skip ExecCheckRTPerms in CTAS with no data |
| Previous Message | Andy Fan | 2020-11-21 08:58:47 | Re: Different results between PostgreSQL and Oracle for "for update" statement |