From: | Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: State of our hosting page |
Date: | 2012-10-12 16:40:22 |
Message-ID: | CAN1EF+y0hihSKy2wo2bNQSo3=-dcfitzqgmJGt8Xsu0cH_3Tfw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > This is out of date:
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_hosting/
> >
> > Also, compared to the PostGIS list, our list seems oddly corporate and
> > lacking:
> >
> > http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/wiki/UsersWikiPostGISHosters
> >
> > Perhaps the solution is to start a wiki page?
>
> The page on the website is dynamically generated and can easily be
> added to by hosters or others. I don't see how moving to a wiki page
> would make it any more up to date than the current page could be - and
> it has the downside of moving yet another page onto the wiki which has
> very a poor page rank in Google.
How do we remove companies whose information is obsolete?
-selena
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2012-10-13 16:26:41 | Re: State of our hosting page |
Previous Message | Rob Napier | 2012-10-12 14:56:02 | Re: No awards? |