Re: Reject WAIT FOR earlier in transaction-snapshot mode

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reject WAIT FOR earlier in transaction-snapshot mode
Date: 2026-09-18 17:58:06
Message-ID: CAN12+YLP6Tr1eWrzgrJ2cJXRvPMJk+CjKoDboPXqmrp=kQ7ZGg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 09:48:13AM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > Thank you, pushed.
>
> Can the open item for this one be marked as resolved?

Done.

--
Sami

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2026-09-18 18:08:43 Re: Regression tests failures due to concurrent grants
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2026-09-18 17:40:00 Re: Introduce XID age based replication slot invalidation