Re: Reject WAIT FOR earlier in transaction-snapshot mode

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reject WAIT FOR earlier in transaction-snapshot mode
Date: 2026-09-09 14:11:37
Message-ID: CAN12+YKYhBYPptY2dfekvCu78qtd1xs-oWRYMggBUhazZdH2ag@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> V2 LGTM.

Thanks!

> Do you prefer to keep the snapshot and isolation-level checks
> next to each other?

Can you elaborate on this point? Do you mean combine them in
a single block?

--
Sami

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Burd 2026-09-09 14:14:40 Re: Support for 8-byte TOAST values, round two
Previous Message Ayoub Kazar 2026-09-09 14:06:10 Re: Add pg_stat_vfdcache view for VFD cache statistics