>
> I see the traction here, but I cannot really get fully convinced by a
> grouping of the timeouts without more input. As a whole, I think that
> Sirisha's patch is fine enough on its own.
>
Perhaps LSN is enough for now as it will be the value that will vary the
most with heavy usage. I don't know how often TIMEOUT values will
vary however, so I'll drop the options normalization idea for now.
--
Sami