Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 8:46 PM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 7:10 PM Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)adjust(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> More generally, I'd like this material to be code comments. It's the
> >> kind of stuff that gets outdated before long if it's kept separate.
> >
> > The problem is that code comments are not going to be good places to
> document "how do I check for pending actions?" That could be moved to the
> main SGML I guess.....
>
> I aggree with Peter here, for me it also feels more natural to have this
> information as code commentaries - at least if I would search for it that
> would
> be my first thought. As for "how do I..." part, I think there are alreasy
> similar commentaries in the code, which makes sense - this kind of
> questions
> usually appear when you're reading/writing some code.
>
> It doesn't look like there is much left to do in this discussion, but for
> now
> I'll move it to the next CF.
>

Ok will move this into code comments if there are no objections.

--
Best Regards,
Chris Travers
Head of Database

Tel: +49 162 9037 210 | Skype: einhverfr | www.adjust.com
Saarbrücker Straße 37a, 10405 Berlin