From: | grg bnc <grgbnc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: adding a TOC to the psql reference page |
Date: | 2020-04-30 23:04:51 |
Message-ID: | CAN+Z=3a4VYgDAwDBVKW68AOzY_XSgVzCtm_6-022yCNXxNpx9w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
For SQL commands that are:
- heavily used, and
- structurally involved
i'd say yes (`CREATE TABLE` comes to mind); otherwise, don't bother.
The above selection criteria are subjective, so consensus should be
gathered.
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 12:16 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 08:48:09PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/app-psql.html
> > Description:
> >
> > Since https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/app-psql.html is quite
> long,
> > it would be nice to add a detailed table of contents at its beginning, in
> > order to:
> >
> > - allow for easier browsing
> >
> > - allow to reference individual psql options, meta-commands, variables,
> > prompts and environment variables by using their respective id attribute
>
> Yes, I can see the value in that, but I don't think we do that for any
> other SQL comments. Would doing it just for psql make sense?
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
>
> + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
> + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
>
--
All work and no play makes George go astray.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-05-01 03:29:09 | Re: Roles for pg_basebackup |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-04-30 22:26:32 | Re: adding a TOC to the psql reference page |