From: | ajit wangkhem <ajit(dot)wangkhem(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rajesh Kumar <rajeshkumar(dot)dba09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, rams nalabolu <ramsveeru441(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Basebackup |
Date: | 2024-09-03 14:45:23 |
Message-ID: | CAMurXp0UvUTqYaRfg1R2Vrsu1VCootxaSjdisMmc6+q=yXq4zg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
To overcome performance used Peer to Peer of both machines with CAT6A cable
so that you get 10GBPS speed and this does not hamer primary server because
separate network used for replication and also if possible used replication
slot. This was already tested in 1.6 TB data. If you have problem in
storage than used ( --format=tar --gzip) in pg_basebackup and then
decompress it.
Regards,
Ajit W
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 8:05 PM rams nalabolu <ramsveeru441(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The difference is that offloading resource consumption on primary while
> taking backup and copy it to new server.
> So it’s better to run it from new server
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 7:31 AM Rajesh Kumar <rajeshkumar(dot)dba09(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> How different is basebackup from new server with primary host and rsync
>> from primary, move to new server and start cluster?
>>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2024-09-03 14:52:55 | Re: Basebackup |
Previous Message | rams nalabolu | 2024-09-03 14:34:42 | Re: Basebackup |