| From: | Soumya S Murali <soumyamurali(dot)work(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Expose checkpoint timestamp and duration in pg_stat_checkpointer |
| Date: | 2025-11-27 11:39:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAMtXxw9UnM46nq5Q_XeAEiffkEMme-GpwVQane_Oqf7sWX-joA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi all,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 11:11 PM Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 06:23:08PM +0100, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
> > El mié, 26 nov 2025, 11:14, Soumya S Murali <soumyamurali(dot)work(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > escribió:
> > There is a "Checkpoints" section in the pgbadger reports, and that's
> > probably the most widely used tool.
>
> That one parses the Postgres logs, so is unaffected by the changes to
> pg_stat_checkpointer discussed here.
Thank you for the suggestions. I will refer to how pgbadger visualizes
checkpoints and also will check whether any other monitoring tools
provide meaningful checkpoint charts. If I find anything useful, I’ll
share it.
Regards,
Soumya
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2025-11-27 11:45:32 | Re: tuple radix sort |
| Previous Message | Kirill Reshke | 2025-11-27 11:39:39 | Re: Remove unused function parameters, part 1: contrib |