| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposed change to make cancellations safe |
| Date: | 2016-04-25 12:34:06 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YHc_qPds5hJySXq6rvUG0hKOBLZgwpprptDkE_oczWHCw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 24 April 2016 at 23:11, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Have you seen this to be a problem in practice, or is it just
> theoretical? I do not recall many, if any, field complaints
> about the issue.
>
It's caused pain for me when working with JDBC in the past.
If libpq gets pipelined query support in future it'll become much more
noticeable. Right now libpq won't be too bothered.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2016-04-25 12:34:34 | Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-04-25 12:31:16 | Re: Updated backup APIs for non-exclusive backups |