Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haroon <muhammad(dot)haroon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Umair Shahid <umair(dot)shahid(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)
Date: 2016-06-24 05:16:26
Message-ID: CAMsr+YHUKyLTkx3UeONFbZPhntDfZj+Ba--L1Dw4k9iVneQ+pg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24 June 2016 at 13:00, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> I've now reproduced it with:
>

I can also confirm that it _doesn't_ crash with the same SDK using a 32-bit
build (running under WoW on x64). cl 18.00.40629 for x86, env:

%comspec% /k ""C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio
12.0\VC\vcvarsall.bat" x86"

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-06-24 05:46:25 Re: [BUG] pg_basebackup from disconnected standby fails
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-06-24 05:00:12 Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)