Re: RFC/WIP: adding new configuration options to TOAST

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC/WIP: adding new configuration options to TOAST
Date: 2015-11-04 01:21:58
Message-ID: CAMsr+YHQj9S0c=____Sc43iThEaSkPXpWADbq4pDt44VfFYGjQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3 November 2015 at 23:04, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Looking for feedback to see if anyone sees any issues or has any
> suggestions on what I'm doing. The attached patch alters 3 things
> with regard to TOAST behavior:

COMPRESSION_TEST_SIZE (2) seems useful.

The other two mostly seem like options nobody's going to know are
there, or know how to sensibly set if they do notice them. What's the
driving reason behind those, the problem you're trying to solve? Why
make them configurable per-table (or at all)?

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-11-04 01:44:14 Re: PoC: Partial sort
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2015-11-04 00:36:42 Re: BUG #13741: vacuumdb does not accept valid password