Re: Error: dsa_area could not attach to a segment that has been freed

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Gaddam Sai Ram <gaddamsairam(dot)n(at)zohocorp(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Error: dsa_area could not attach to a segment that has been freed
Date: 2017-09-20 09:54:09
Message-ID: CAMsr+YHHN0Co37xqe7OUY8j2+QVRW-SAUJyOiw1KGkWqPZ==qQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 20 September 2017 at 17:52, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 20 September 2017 at 16:55, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> > wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Gaddam Sai Ram
>> <gaddamsairam(dot)n(at)zohocorp(dot)com> wrote:
>> > Thank you very much! That fixed my issue! :)
>> > I was in an assumption that pinning the area will increase its lifetime
>> but
>> > yeah after taking memory context into consideration its working fine!
>>
>> So far the success rate in confusing people who first try to make
>> long-lived DSA areas and DSM segments is 100%. Basically, this is all
>> designed to ensure automatic cleanup of resources in short-lived
>> scopes.
>>
>
> 90% ;)
>
> I got it working with no significant issues for a long lived segment used
> to store a pool of shm_mq pairs used for a sort of "connection listener"
> bgworker. Though I only used DSM+ToC, not DSA.
>
>
By the way, dsa.c really needs a cross-reference to shm_toc.c and vice
versa. With a hint as to when each is appropriate.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2017-09-20 09:58:57 Re: Allow GiST opcalsses without compress\decompres functions
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2017-09-20 09:52:30 Re: Error: dsa_area could not attach to a segment that has been freed