Re: 2PC support for pglogical

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2PC support for pglogical
Date: 2016-03-25 12:53:38
Message-ID: CAMsr+YHAtXwN7FUH6qiE_D9zgwR4wSg84xkkrBWeKjLSDsnMZg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24 March 2016 at 22:20, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:

>
> I think all the locking already handled properly by creating dummy backend
> in PGPROC, as it done in usual postgres 2pc implementation.
>
>
On the downstream, yes. But what about the decoding, reorder buffer and
output plugin? They access the relcache etc. If you changed the structure
of a table in a prepared xact you have to make sure you get that right.

> Just checked DDL with following scenario:
>
> * prepare tx that inserts a row in table on master
> * execute DROP TABLE on pglogical slave
> * commit prepared on master
>
> Now it behaves as expected — slave blocks DROP TABLE until commit prepared
> on master.
>

Try doing DDL in the prepared xact on the upstream side, especially things
that make structural changes to tables. Test both things that do full-table
rewrites (alter table ... add column ... default not null) and things that
don't (alter table ... drop column ; alter table ... add column ...;
without not null or default).

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-03-25 12:55:46 Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-03-25 12:48:56 Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE