| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding |
| Date: | 2016-03-05 03:23:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YHAo2OjonvhSaaHeYmP4SnM4URkW+duxSyoYV_6jpmOYg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 27 February 2016 at 11:54, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I could submit a patch adding
> hooks to core to enable all of the things (or even just some of the
> things) that EnterpriseDB has changed in Advanced Server, and that
> patch would be rejected so fast it would make your head spin, because
> of course the core project doesn't want to be burdened with
> maintaining a whole bunch of hooks for the convenience of
> EnterpriseDB.
I can imagine that many such hooks would have little use beyond PPAS, but
I'm somewhat curious as to if any would have wider applications. It's not
unusual for me to be working on something and think "gee, I wish there was
a hook here".
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-03-05 03:37:16 | Re: ExecGather() + nworkers |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-03-05 03:09:55 | Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc |