From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, "Prabakaran, Vaishnavi" <VaishnaviP(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Manuel Kniep <m(dot)kniep(at)web(dot)de>, "fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp" <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq |
Date: | 2017-06-20 01:43:24 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YH690f7F+xUzGOTwaVYogRxXAA4gTYHDq_SXdVBf6X1PQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 20 June 2017 at 06:49, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2017-04-05 15:45:26 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2017-04-05 17:00:42 +1000, Vaishnavi Prabakaran wrote:
>> > Regarding test patch, I have corrected the test suite after David Steele's
>> > comments.
>> > Also, I would like to mention that a companion patch was submitted by David
>> > Steele up-thread.
>> >
>> > Attached the latest code and test patch.
>>
>> My impression is that this'll need a couple more rounds of review. Given
>> that this'll establish API we'll pretty much ever going to be able to
>> change/remove, I think it'd be a bad idea to rush this into v10.
>> Therefore I propose moving this to the next CF.
>
> Craig, Vaishnavi, everyone else: Are you planning to continue to work on
> this for v11? I'm willing to do another round, but only if it's
> worthwhile.
I'm happy to work on review, and will try to make some time, but have
to focus primarily on logical rep infrastructure. This patch was a
proof of concept and fun hack for me and while I'm glad folks are
interested, it's not something I can dedicate much time to. Especially
with a 6-week-old baby now....
> FWIW, I still think this needs a pgbench or similar example integration,
> so we can actually properly measure the benefits.
I agree. I originally wanted to patch psql, but it's pretty intrusive.
pgbench is likely a better target. Also pg_restore.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-06-20 01:45:27 | Re: REPLICA IDENTITY FULL |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-06-20 00:51:50 | Re: Something is rotten in publication drop |