| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | juergen(at)purtz(dot)de |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: First SVG graphic |
| Date: | 2018-11-29 03:48:17 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YH3bC2JqLE8QyEj7X5U5YNzSU7Z2Z5Dj-72Deom7nSZHg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 01:33, Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de> wrote:
> After one week no response at all? Neither positive nor negative. It
> seems that the community has little interest in the SVG issue. Or in my
> suggestion?
>
I'm excited you're doing it. I thought it was part of an existing/ongoing
discussion and didn't really have much to say. I think it's a vital step
forward and we really need to get some graphics into Pg.
Personally I want to let go a bit of the diff-able, merge-able requirements
and accept that not everything plays well when hand written. I got tired of
the arguments that seemed to require that no tool written since 1972 could
be used in our source tree lest SunOS 0.9.ancient have a fit, or someone
find a (gasp) binary in a diff.
So good on you for getting positive action rolling.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2018-11-29 04:35:17 | Updating the intro for packages - improve usability, reduce new user confusion |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-11-29 03:27:31 | Re: Return codes for archive and restore commands |