| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is txid_status() actually safe? / What is 011_crash_recovery.pl testing? |
| Date: | 2021-05-05 14:37:52 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YH0yFadUtPHE8OLJ8B=FVjqsaknhiPCtfxYPnrs2TE1SQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 04:28, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 4:52 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > The 011_crash_recovery.pl test test starts a transaction, creates a
> > table, fetches the transaction's xid. Then shuts down the server in
> > immediate mode. It then asserts that after crash recovery the previously
> > assigned xid is shown as aborted, and that new xids are assigned after
> > the xid.
> >
> > But as far as I can tell there's no guarantee that that is the case.
>
> I think you are right.
>
>
Andres, I missed this mail initially. I'll look into it shortly.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
2ndQuadrant - PostgreSQL Solutions for the Enterprise
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-05-05 15:04:11 | pg_receivewal makes a bad daemon |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-05-05 14:27:46 | Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs |