Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers

From: Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amit(dot)khandekar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
Date: 2016-12-18 02:25:34
Message-ID: CAMsr+YH+=FiVV_OvKdN0z8x8cVZhqv-7f9N5ecJFudyhkkzypw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22 Nov. 2016 01:05, "Kevin Grittner" <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

Right, I think we should assume that there will be other ways
people want to use parts of what is done here, including building
tuplestores through other means and referencing them in queries.

Yes. PL/pgsql table-valued variables for one thing.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-12-18 02:29:51 Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-12-18 02:20:21 Re: Trouble building uuid-ossp extension in new versions of Postgres