Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, "Prabakaran, Vaishnavi" <VaishnaviP(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Manuel Kniep <m(dot)kniep(at)web(dot)de>, "fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp" <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date: 2017-03-27 07:42:08
Message-ID: CAMsr+YGzT6b5tX0w81uqE2fwTb3f_kp_UtYoxTK7tw=iY7rJYg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 27 March 2017 at 15:26, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm fairly confident that I overlooked single row mode entirely in the
>> original patch, though it's long enough ago that it's hard for me to
>> remember exactly.
>>
>> I don't really have much of an opinion on the best handling of it.
>>
>> I would expect to be setting single-row mode just before I requested
>> the *result* from the next pending query, since it relates to result
>> processing rather than query dispatch. But that's about all the
>> opinion I have here.
>
> Yeah, I think that it makes sense to allow users to switch to single
> row mode before requesting a result in the queue. It seems to me that
> this should also be effective only during the fetching of one single
> result set. When the client moves on to the next item in the queue we
> should make necessary again a call to PQsetSingleRowMode().
>
> Regarding the patch, I have spotted the following things in the last version:
> - src/test/modules/Makefile should include test_libpq.
> - Regression tests from 0002 are failing:
> ok 1 - testlibpqbatch disallowed_in_batch
> ok 2 - testlibpqbatch simple_batch
> ok 3 - testlibpqbatch multi_batch
> ok 4 - testlibpqbatch batch_abort
> ok 5 - testlibpqbatch timings
> not ok 6 - testlibpqbatch copyfailure

There are only a few more days left of this commit fest.

Things are sounding pretty ready here, with some final cleanups
pending. It'd be cool to get this into Pg 10 :)

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-03-27 07:49:08 Re: free space map and visibility map
Previous Message Amit Khandekar 2017-03-27 07:35:59 Re: UPDATE of partition key