Re: Equivalent of --enable-tap-tests in MSVC scripts

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Equivalent of --enable-tap-tests in MSVC scripts
Date: 2016-03-04 16:16:16
Message-ID: CAMsr+YGvSsrWU4eUZNZOu6SqqcpJdqbgidar8dA37ucLXb=PZQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5 March 2016 at 00:10, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> Craig Ringer wrote:
>
> > If it's the result of perltidy changing its mind about the formatting as
> a
> > result of this change I guess we have to eyeroll and live with it.
> perltidy
> > leaves the file alone as it is in the tree currently, so that be it.
> >
> > Gripe withdrawn, ready for committer IMO
>
> Okay, thanks. I applied it back to 9.4, which is when
> --enable-tap-tests appeared. I didn't perltidy 9.4's config_default.pl,
> though.

Thanks very much. It didn't occur to me to backport it, but it seems
harmless.

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/9/566/ marked as committed.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-03-04 16:17:41 Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-03-04 16:14:18 Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc