On 18 Nov. 2016 13:14, "Kyotaro HORIGUCHI" <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> We had too-early WAL recycling during a test we had on a sync
> replication set. This is not a bug and a bit extreme case but is
> contrary to expectation on synchronous replication.
Isn't this prevented by using a physical replication slot?
You hint that you looked at slots but they didn't meet your needs in some
way. I'm not sure I understood the last part.