Re: RustgreSQL

From: Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RustgreSQL
Date: 2017-01-08 14:28:56
Message-ID: CAMsr+YGYvgntrYZRvkfx5bSPoFQHQfz8bNGW1PNH991YikrTiA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Is this completely unrealistic or is it carved in stone PostgreSQL will
always be a C project forever and ever?

Another thing to look at if you want to approach this as a serious,
practical effort is the atomics, memory barrier, spinlock and lwlock code.

I just don't see it happening.

In response to

  • RustgreSQL at 2017-01-08 09:09:15 from Joel Jacobson

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2017-01-08 16:28:17 Re: RustgreSQL
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2017-01-08 14:23:19 Re: RustgreSQL