| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | konstantin knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_prepared_xact_status |
| Date: | 2017-10-02 01:38:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YGQ4N7XQwsBcj4kw1jnTQ6QOTiFJ0oBPaCmYmA7pLcBCQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 30 September 2017 at 14:10, konstantin knizhnik <
k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> So I do not see any troubles caused by adding this functions. And it can
> really be helpful for DBA in some cases.
>
If it's self-contained and exposes existing functionality, then I'm not
opposed, I just don't really see the point. I'm not seeing where it'd come
in useful.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-10-02 01:43:20 | Re: [PATCH] Off-by-one error in logical slot resource retention |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-10-02 01:32:40 | Re: pg_prepared_xact_status |