| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: snapbuild woes |
| Date: | 2016-12-12 02:42:33 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YGOXQ6+hqESpgXBfLDY53ViWJ_t=RJog=_HzV5xKuONBA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12 December 2016 at 00:36, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Craig Ringer
> <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 11 Dec. 2016 06:50, "Petr Jelinek" <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On 10/12/16 23:10, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>>
>>>> The attached 0002-Skip-unnecessary-snapshot-builds.patch changes this
>>>> behavior so that we don't make snapshots for transactions that we seen
>>>> wholly and know that they didn't make catalog changes even if we didn't
>>>> reach consistency yet.
>>>
>>> Eh, attached wrong patch. This one is correct.
>>
>> Attached no patch second time?
>
> I see an attachment, and it shows in the archives.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aee1d499-e3ca-e091-56da-1ee6a47741c8%402ndquadrant.com
Sorry for the noise, apparently my phone's mail client was being dense.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-12-12 03:58:35 | Re: jacana hung after failing to acquire random number |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2016-12-12 01:02:00 | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |