Re: Timeline following for logical slots

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Timeline following for logical slots
Date: 2016-03-23 00:51:12
Message-ID: CAMsr+YGMUW1pj-SDmr6umBgs39KS9O-3PoL1AYyCN+5g7c3APQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22 March 2016 at 19:48, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> On 2016-03-15 21:04:12 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> > Thanks very much for the review.
>
> Are you planning to update the patch?
>

Yes. I just spoke to Álvaro earlier. I'll pick up his modified version of
my patch, remove the unrelated cleanup stuff he added, amend the other
issues and re-post today.

Then I'll try to get an updated pglogical_output up, now that I've knocked
off a variety of urgent work elsewhere...

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-03-23 00:51:38 Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-03-23 00:48:07 Re: Updated backup APIs for non-exclusive backups