Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

On 3 October 2016 at 10:10, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 6 September 2016 at 16:10, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> wrote:
>>> Craig Ringer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Updated patch attached.
>>>
>>> Please find attached a couple fixes for typos I've came across in
>>> the doc part.
>>
>> Thanks, will apply and post a rebased patch soon, or if someone picks
>> this up in the mean time they can apply your diff on top of the patch.
>
> Could you send an updated patch then? At the same time I am noticing
> that git --check is complaining... This patch has tests and a
> well-documented feature, so I'll take a look at it soon at the top of
> my list. Moved to next CF for now.

Thanks.

I'd really like to teach psql in non-interactive mode to use it, but
(a) I'm concerned about possible subtle behaviour differences arising
if we do that and (b) I won't have the time. I think it's mostly of
interest to app authors and driver developers and that's what it's
aimed at. pg_restore could benefit a lot too.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services