Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Date: 2018-04-26 02:16:52
Message-ID: CAMsr+YG6pW8O9gTpJktyUR6+_4qqmF7KTBKm21BhxrrZ7BZgbQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24 April 2018 at 04:14, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> I'm LSF/MM to discuss future behaviour of linux here, but that's how it
> is right now.

Interim LWN.net coverage of that can be found here:
https://lwn.net/Articles/752613/

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-04-26 02:20:34 Re: pg_recvlogical broken in back branches
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-04-26 02:09:08 Re: Built-in connection pooling