Re: Logical replication and synchronous replication

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical replication and synchronous replication
Date: 2017-04-18 12:05:55
Message-ID: CAMsr+YFvHP8_xWBeMzzx1nz_5gfz+dW4dNNwQHqA7j1RUTX6tw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18 April 2017 at 18:55, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As doc of logical decoding said as a note[1], logical replication can
> support the synchronous replication with some restriction. But In
> addition to this, IIUC in logical replication decoded data is sent to
> subscribers only when the commit WAL record is decoded (calls
> ReorderBufferCommit) .

Correct.

> It means that the local SQL execution and
> applying the decoded data on subscriber side are always executed in a
> sequential order, and the response time can simply be doubled or even
> more (OTOH a good point is that decoded data of aborted transaction is
> never sent to subscriber). I think there will be a lot of peoples who
> want to use logical synchronous replication but this is a big
> restriction for such user. I think we should document it or deal with
> it.
> Thought?

Definitely should be documented. I think it's covered under logical
decoding, but needs at least an xref.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-04-18 12:12:43 Re: Failed recovery with new faster 2PC code
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2017-04-18 11:58:28 Re: SCRAM authentication, take three