| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE |
| Date: | 2017-01-16 09:37:09 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YFp_-phv_-92G9ENLeTF35=gq0FRz4auF3S9UMYRUW-Wg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 16 Jan. 2017 17:09, "Michael Paquier" <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I also have longer term plans to show the first and third of them
> running with the read-only transaction moved to a standby server.
> Kevin Grittner gave me the idea of multi-server isolation tests when I
> mentioned my WIP SERIALIZABLE DEFERRABLE-on-standbys patch off-list,
Being able to do that with the isolation tester has been mentioned a
coupled of times, particularly from 2ndQ folks who worked in BDR. I
think that it has been actually patched in this sense, so perhaps you
could reuse the work that has been done there.
Yep. See the bdr-pg/REL9_4_STABLE branch of the BDR repo,
src/test/isolation .
I think Abhijit submitted a patch to the list too.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2017-01-16 09:57:03 | Re: Typo in condition_variable.c |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-01-16 09:34:34 | Re: Typo in condition_variable.c |