Re: 9.6 TAP tests and extensions

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.6 TAP tests and extensions
Date: 2016-09-24 07:58:28
Message-ID: CAMsr+YFXuKshHp1=nx+K7=U=2P8SSfqqBmvjYwqGTMmcMioT2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24 Sep. 2016 04:04, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:.
>
> >
> > It's thus sufficient to apply the patch to install the perl modules to
> > 9.4, 9.5 and 9.6. Nothing else is needed. I've attached backports for
> > 9.4 and 9.5.
>
> Pushed with cosmetic adjustments ---

Thanks.

> Looking back over the thread, I see that you also proposed installing
> isolationtester and pg_isolation_regress for the benefit of extensions.
> I'm very much less excited about that idea. It'd be substantially more
> dead weight in typical installations, and I'm not sure that it'd be useful
> to common extensions, and I'm not eager to treat isolationtester's API
> and behavior as something we need to hold stable for extension use.

Fine by me. I have no particular problem expecting those to be installed
explicitly by ext devs who want to use them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2016-09-24 08:24:22 Re: Refactor StartupXLOG?
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2016-09-24 06:42:16 raised checkpoint limit & manual checkpoint