Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anthony Iliopoulos <ailiop(at)altatus(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Date: 2018-04-04 14:42:18
Message-ID: CAMsr+YFFYO1eHTGzT1wnoRW6L_PmP8MDFhbcdVBjBKQSF9fkYw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4 April 2018 at 22:25, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:09:09PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> > On 4 April 2018 at 22:00, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > It's the error reporting issues around closing and reopening files
> with
> > outstanding buffered I/O that's really going to hurt us here. I'll be
> > expanding my test case to cover that shortly.
> >
> >
> >
> > Also, just to be clear, this is not in any way confined to xfs and/or
> lvm as I
> > originally thought it might be.
> >
> > Nor is ext3/ext4's errors=remount-ro protective. data_err=abort doesn't
> help
> > either (so what does it do?).
>
> Anthony Iliopoulos reported in this thread that errors=remount-ro is
> only affected by metadata writes.

Yep, I gathered. I was referring to data_err.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksandr Parfenov 2018-04-04 14:49:08 Re: new function for tsquery creartion
Previous Message Dmitry Ivanov 2018-04-04 14:33:47 Re: new function for tsquery creartion