Re: Logical Replication WIP

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical Replication WIP
Date: 2016-09-15 02:38:42
Message-ID: CAMsr+YFB2t9u4T_xFzVJKB+1qVdohcL9hti7mvfmJgnLRWqyeQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14 September 2016 at 04:56, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> Not sure what you mean by negotiation. Why would that be needed? You know
> server version when you connect and when you know that you also know what
> capabilities that version of Postgres has. If you send unrecognized option
> you get corresponding error.

Right, because we can rely on the server version = the logical
replication version now.

All good.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2016-09-15 02:41:16 Re: make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-09-15 02:28:18 Re: [PATCH v2] Add overflow checks to money type input function