Re: Proposal: Adding json logging

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: David Arnold <dar(at)xoe(dot)solutions>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Adding json logging
Date: 2018-04-14 12:58:58
Message-ID: CAMsr+YFAfeanpq6hxxU129cvZ3tFuSOA38BOrCfrSDj9qydBow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14 April 2018 at 11:24, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

> "I proposed that a couple of years back, to be rejected as the key names
> are too much repetitive and take too much place.

gzip is astonishingly good at dealing with that, so I think that's
actually a bit of a silly reason to block it.

Plus it's likely only a short-lived interchange format, not something
to be retained for a long period.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-04-14 13:58:55 Re: missing support of named convention for procedures
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-14 11:51:40 Re: partitioning code reorganization