Re: SQL MERGE patches for PostgreSQL Versions

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kang Yuzhe <tiggreen87(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, bxzhai2010(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: SQL MERGE patches for PostgreSQL Versions
Date: 2017-06-22 08:23:48
Message-ID: CAMsr+YF8wt5cWy+VrVb3uCBPDXK=aPaOKcZ3_DfWcoahTk3tfQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22 June 2017 at 16:05, Kang Yuzhe <tiggreen87(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Dear PG hackers,
>
> First my apology if I appear to be a jerk or not following the policy.
>
> I emailed Boxuan Zhai who was in charge of the SQL Merge keyword in
> 2010 of GSoC but without reply.
>
> I want to apply merge_v201.patch to specific PG version.
>
> It failed saying 1 or 2 of 5 hunk failed.
>
> My question is:
> 1. Given x old patch of PG, is it possible to know to which PG
> version can be applied?

If it's produced by git-format-patch you can look at the git ref
information in the patch. Otherwise you have to rely on what's in the
email thread.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo Nagata 2017-06-22 08:24:57 Re: Optional message to user when terminating/cancelling backend
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2017-06-22 08:20:11 Re: Autovacuum launcher occurs error when cancelled by SIGINT