Re: Is there a cache consistent interface to tables ?

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Gary M <garym(at)oedata(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is there a cache consistent interface to tables ?
Date: 2018-02-11 12:11:19
Message-ID: CAMsr+YEwf2RYK4Dd7LuiW6YHTfcpPcdE9eJ2Qw7k3PD6_JzCrQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11 February 2018 at 04:44, Gary M <garym(at)oedata(dot)com> wrote:

> Thanks Craig,
>
> As I'm back in pg code after many years, I'm feeling much better there's
> one (1) or two (2) items causing the hiccup. Rereading your comments, I'm
> agreeing with you. I'm considering bumping up the ram to 512gb as a RAM
> disk just for consistent profiling (an old bad habit).
>
> I'm reassessing my profiling plan. I'm getting ahead of myself thinking
> the OS is not having a significant effect.
>

Definitely. Especially since PostgreSQL uses buffered I/O.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikolay Shaplov 2018-02-11 13:51:49 Re: [PATCH][PROPOSAL] Add enum releation option type
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2018-02-11 07:45:10 Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly