Re: WIP: About CMake v2

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date: 2015-11-26 01:13:26
Message-ID: CAMsr+YEnYk7WHi3DwMYydDgL7dkp93++KPj9PjJjW2Z+Amzn=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 25 November 2015 at 17:41, YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
wrote:

>
> > Many prewritten CMake modules fail to follow basic practices that make
> them
> > work anywhere but where the author wanted/needed.
> Now everything is much better. And it is worth split "make" and
> configuration.
> CMake better GNU Make and is similar to the m4 for configuring. But M4
> older
> and elaborated.
>
> These are my feelings on the current work.

That's great to hear. It's been a long while since I worked with it, and it
sounds like it's come a long way.

I'd be really happy to see a unified build system in Pg.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-11-26 02:41:32 parallel joins, and better parallel explain
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-11-25 22:59:48 Redefine default result from PQhost()?