From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc |
Date: | 2016-03-02 05:49:06 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YEkr6wsE=QjekSjW=Mbwn+Kt9fkMt69w7UQGK2bMfJSXQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2 March 2016 at 13:22, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I wrote:
> >> > Can't use string ("Test::Builder") as a HASH ref while "strict refs"
> in use at /usr/share/perl5/Test/Builder.pm line 1798.
> >>
> >> > The referenced line number is the end of the file,
> >>
> >> Oh, scratch that; I was looking at the wrong file. Actually,
> >> /usr/share/perl5/Test/Builder.pm has
> >>
> >> sub details {
> >> my $self = shift;
> >> return @{ $self->{Test_Results} };
> >> }
> >>
> >> and line 1798 is the "return" statement in that. I still lack enough
> >> Perl-fu to decipher this, though.
> >
> > I think it's complaining about being called as a class method. Perhaps
> > this would work:
> >
> > + foreach my $detail (Test::More->builder->details())
>
> Yes, that's the problem. Instead of using details(), summary() is
> enough actually. And it is enough to let caller know the failure when
> just one test has been found as not passing. See attached.
>
Thanks.
I'm setting up a container with Debian Wheezy, which looks old enough to
test proposed framework changes, so I'll be able to test future patches
against a real Perl 5.8.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-03-02 05:50:33 | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |
Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2016-03-02 05:35:26 | Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics |