Re: Questions about PostgreSQL implementation details

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Delplanque <julien(dot)delplanque(at)inria(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Questions about PostgreSQL implementation details
Date: 2019-12-13 05:33:49
Message-ID: CAMsr+YESMtTG5P0HP=K3k_ac9f+gz_y2QejHQrvN5YV3EfYxMg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 01:21, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > [ useful tips about finding the code that implements a SQL command ]
>
> BTW, if it wasn't obvious already, you *really* want to have some kind
> of tool that easily finds the definition of a particular C symbol.
> You can fall back on "grep -r" or "git grep", but lots of people use
> ctags or etags or some other C-aware indexing tool.
>
>
I strongly recommend cscope with editor integration for your preferred
editor btw.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
2ndQuadrant - PostgreSQL Solutions for the Enterprise

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-12-13 05:38:03 Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2019-12-13 05:31:55 Re: A varint implementation for PG?