Re: Do we need SQL-level access to amoptions functions?

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Do we need SQL-level access to amoptions functions?
Date: 2016-01-18 08:10:16
Message-ID: CAMsr+YEB1O+doB2t_O=u3D3MMHMvzkaSOZg3Rw38vCvfrtHNBQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18 January 2016 at 04:13, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>
> Does anyone know of client code that's actually doing this?
>
>
site:github.com "ginoptions" -"pg_am.h" -"ginutil.c" -png -typedefs -vim

and the same for "btreeoptions" looks promising.

Nothing seems to spring out on https://searchcode.com either.

It seems quite reasonable to leave such an esoteric corner as "fix it if
somebody screams" territory for a point release.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-01-18 08:17:37 Re: Sequence Access Method WIP
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-01-18 08:03:53 Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'