| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-05-17 05:45:09 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YE8F+CDdKnRtVPeNunuXLnkLxAbH6R=zppDEf1E7POjCA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 14 May 2016 at 02:49, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> * This year's major release will be 9.6.0, with minor updates 9.6.1,
> 9.6.2, etc. It's too late to do otherwise for this release cycle.
>
> * Next year's major release will be 10.0, with minor updates 10.1,
> 10.2, etc.
>
> * The year after, 11.0. Etc cetera.
>
>
Yes. Please!
I get tired of explaining to people that PostgreSQL "9.x" isn't a thing,
that yes, 9.3 and 9.4 really _do_ have incompatible data directories and
replication protocols, and that when the docs say "major version" they
don't mean "major version as you might actually expect" but "first two
version number parts".
Lets get rid of this user-baffling wart.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rajkumar Raghuwanshi | 2016-05-17 06:54:37 | Re: Postgres_fdw join pushdown - getting server crash in left outer join of three table |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-05-17 01:59:27 | Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal |