Re: Spelling dictionaries

From: hmidi slim <hmidi(dot)slim2(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Spelling dictionaries
Date: 2017-11-10 14:27:18
Message-ID: CAMsqVxu40n7mYfhg2_GN0R7_Ej=AbWcTFgC=knu8abQ2Gmaruw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

What about pg_similarity https://github.com/eulerto/pg_similarity. Do you
have any idea about this?

2017-11-10 10:36 GMT+01:00 Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>:

> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:16:06AM +0100, hmidi slim wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm using Full Text search and I'm interested on using spelling
> dictionary.
> > I found a website that has a special functionality, for example when I
> > enter the word 'activities' it gives me the suggestions containing this
> > word. But when I enter the word 'activityns' it returns 'No result for
> > 'activityns'' But it gives me some suggestions contained the word
> > 'activities'.
> > In cas I entered the word 'activityng' it returns the same message 'No
> > result for 'activityng' ' But I got some suggestions containing the word
> > 'activity'.
> > Does this the behaviour of the lspell dictionary, because I didn't
> > understand how does he give suggestions when the word is wrong.
>
> You can try pg_trgm extension [1].
>
> Also we have a little demo web-site [2]. It uses pg_trgm. You can look at
> its code [3].
>
>
> 1 - https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/pgtrgm.
> html#idm46428634444576
> 2 - http://tsdemo.postgrespro.ru/search?pattern=Galaksy&order=
> rank&rank_func=ts_rank
> 3 - https://github.com/postgrespro/apod_fts/blob/master/apod.py
>
> --
> Arthur Zakirov
> Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
> Russian Postgres Company
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dinesh kumar 2017-11-10 14:28:28 sync the data's from catalog table
Previous Message Berend Tober 2017-11-10 13:56:26 Re: Client Authentication methods