Re: psql \df option for procedures

From: Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql \df option for procedures
Date: 2018-07-02 17:06:28
Message-ID: CAMsGm5fjFtD3XUaAJwHJpJ1zqGqBfBLp-QFvuN2i4N2HwLC6Rw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

While you're looking at \df, you might want to consider removing the
display of source code (we have \sf for that, and it takes up a lot of
space), and add a column to display access permissions (who can execute the
function).

On 2 July 2018 at 09:22, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 7:07 AM, Peter Eisentraut <
> peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > psql's \df command current has options a/n/t/w to show
> > aggregates/normal/trigger/window functions. Do we want to add something
> > for procedures?
> >
>
> +1. I can write a patch to save your time If you don't do it yet.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Fabrízio de Royes Mello Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
> PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Kryuchkov 2018-07-02 17:09:27 Proposed fix for Bug #15259 (invalid empty array returned by intarray "&" operator)
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-07-02 16:28:04 Re: [WIP] [B-Tree] Retail IndexTuple deletion