From: | Alex Richman <alexrichman(at)onesignal(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Niels Stevens <niels(dot)stevens(at)onesignal(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Logical Replica ReorderBuffer Size Accounting Issues |
Date: | 2023-01-06 16:35:30 |
Message-ID: | CAMnUB3qVvWazGHxtC1emxEaTnU28N+CznabVRMbqfNQq9kf9fw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> Do you have any sample data to confirm
> this? If you can't share sample data, can you let us know the average
> tuple size?
>
I suspect the writes are updates to jsonb columns. I can correlate bursts
of writes of this form to the memory spikes:
UPDATE suspect_table
SET jsonb_column = jsonb_column || $1,
updated_at = $2
WHERE ...
The update being added in $1 is typically a single new field. The jsonb
column is flat string key/value pairs, e.g. lots of {"key": "value", ...}.
The average size of the whole tuple in the suspect table is ~800 bytes
(based on 10000 random samples), of which the jsonb column is 80%.
I have been trying to break into a walsender to inspect some tuple bufs
directly and compare the ChangeSize vs GetTupleBuf size as you suggest, but
it's proving a little tricky - I'll let you know if I have any luck here.
Thanks,
- Alex.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-06 17:53:07 | Re: BUG #17717: Regression in vacuumdb (15 is slower than 10/11 and possible memory issue) |
Previous Message | Alex Richman | 2023-01-06 15:19:49 | Re: Segfault while creating logical replication slots on active DB 14.6-1 + 15.1-1 |