Re: Monitoring of a hot standby with a largely idle master

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Monitoring of a hot standby with a largely idle master
Date: 2017-07-27 20:14:41
Message-ID: CAMkU=1zTB_H6O-0m24Ki4OupjsAFHZDeBxKf6dhWqjhx_UBCWw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Michael Paquier <
> michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > wrote:
> >> What do you think about the patch attached?
> >
> > Looks OK. Should it mention specifically "On a hot standby" rather than
> "On
> > a standby"? Otherwise people might be left confused on how they are
> > supposed to do this on a generic standby. It is the kind of thing which
> is
> > obvious once you know it, but confusing the first time you encounter it.
>
> Yes, right. Let's update as you suggest.
>

new version looks good.

Thanks,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Sewell 2017-07-27 20:28:13 Re: Interesting streaming replication issue
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2017-07-27 19:04:32 Re: Indexes being ignored after upgrade to 9.5