From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: checkpoint_flush_after and friends |
Date: | 2016-11-10 20:47:30 |
Message-ID: | CAMkU=1zCqZ9VhOPKbCW0bOuKvwmspJx1vTAs7A1U_di=HsRtHg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2016-11-10 12:13:05 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
> > configuration parameters *_flush_after were added in 9.6. They are not
> in
> > postgresql.conf.sample, but are also not marked GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE. Is
> this
> > intentional and/or desirable?
>
> Hm?
>
> $ grep flush_after src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample
> #bgwriter_flush_after = 0 # 0 disables,
> #backend_flush_after = 0 # 0 disables, default is 0
> #wal_writer_flush_after = 1MB # 0 disables
> #checkpoint_flush_after = 0 # 0 disables,
>
> Andres
>
My apologies. I must have gotten my default conf file from the wrong
initdb.
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Verite | 2016-11-10 21:27:19 | Re: Improvements in psql hooks for variables |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-11-10 20:17:47 | Re: checkpoint_flush_after and friends |