Re: checkpoint_flush_after and friends

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: checkpoint_flush_after and friends
Date: 2016-11-10 20:47:30
Message-ID: CAMkU=1zCqZ9VhOPKbCW0bOuKvwmspJx1vTAs7A1U_di=HsRtHg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> On 2016-11-10 12:13:05 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
> > configuration parameters *_flush_after were added in 9.6. They are not
> in
> > postgresql.conf.sample, but are also not marked GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE. Is
> this
> > intentional and/or desirable?
>
> Hm?
>
> $ grep flush_after src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample
> #bgwriter_flush_after = 0 # 0 disables,
> #backend_flush_after = 0 # 0 disables, default is 0
> #wal_writer_flush_after = 1MB # 0 disables
> #checkpoint_flush_after = 0 # 0 disables,
>
> Andres
>

My apologies. I must have gotten my default conf file from the wrong
initdb.

Jeff

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Verite 2016-11-10 21:27:19 Re: Improvements in psql hooks for variables
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-11-10 20:17:47 Re: checkpoint_flush_after and friends