Re: [PERFORM] In progress INSERT wrecks plans on table

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Flower <gavinflower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] In progress INSERT wrecks plans on table
Date: 2013-07-12 23:25:14
Message-ID: CAMkU=1z8iyZ6ajtBHVGcZ05fMUhu3HCekqqsT6BKnksAzmk8fA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> At 2013-07-10 09:47:34 -0700, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com wrote:
>>
>> Due to the apparent lack of performance testing, I'm setting this back
>> to "needs review".
>
> The original submission (i.e. the message linked from the CF page)
> includes test results that showed a clear performance improvement.

I think the reviewer of a performance patch should do some independent
testing of the performance, to replicate the author's numbers; and
hopefully with a few different scenarios.

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2013-07-12 23:29:54 Re: [Review] Add SPI_gettypmod() to return a field's typemod from a TupleDesc / audit of [E] TODO items
Previous Message Karol Trzcionka 2013-07-12 22:49:45 Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2013-07-13 08:49:23 Re: [PERFORM] In progress INSERT wrecks plans on table
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2013-07-12 22:47:13 Re: In progress INSERT wrecks plans on table