Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables
Date: 2012-11-05 21:23:58
Message-ID: CAMkU=1z4bV3Z-Tv4EB179hL06RdL6gkQ4iDiHn41e-Gr9DcdSQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Or have options for pg_dump and pg_restore to insert "set
>> synchronous_commit=off" into the SQL stream?
>
> It would be kind of neat if we had a command that would force all
> previously-asynchronous commits to complete. It seems likely that
> very, very few people would care about intermediate pg_dump states, so
> we could do the whole dump asynchronously and then do "FORCE ALL
> COMMITS;" or whatever at the end.

Yeah, I was wondering what a fool-proof way of doing that would be,
without implementing a new feature. Turning synchronous_commits back
on and then doing and committing a transaction guaranteed to generate
WAL would do it.

Would a simple 'select pg_switch_xlog();' always accomplish the desired flush?

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-11-05 21:27:44 Re: to_char timezone
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-11-05 21:23:43 Re: alter table tablename add column - breaks pl/pgsql function returns tablename