Re: Combining Aggregates

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Combining Aggregates
Date: 2016-01-23 23:26:12
Message-ID: CAMkU=1yaTqj8OuzGrQbFsHpQVTgj4CAA7axANrdUzPXcK0vn-Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 4:53 PM, David Rowley
<david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> It seems that I must have mistakenly believed that non-existing
> columns for previous versions were handled using the power of magic.
> Turns out that I was wrong, and they need to be included as dummy
> columns in the queries for previous versions.
>
> The attached fixes the problem.

Yep, that fixes it.

Thanks,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2016-01-24 04:27:07 is there a deep unyielding reason to limit U&'' literals to ASCII?
Previous Message Elvis Pranskevichus 2016-01-23 23:25:34 Re: pg_dump fails on domain constraint comments