Re: Supporting Windows SChannel as OpenSSL replacement

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Supporting Windows SChannel as OpenSSL replacement
Date: 2014-07-08 17:11:26
Message-ID: CAMkU=1yJM5MvLuHVpX6fNXVv=1pqyi=ptcm1qPWzX5_8jMdy0Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> wrote:

> On 06/24/2014 03:20 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
>> I've tried your 0001 patch, reflecting this refactoring, on Linux and it
>> caused 'make check' to hang at 'starting postmaster'.
>>
>
> I found the bug in the code, and I have attached the a patch which you can
> apply on top of the patch. The regression tests pass now on my Debian
> machine.
>

Your fix works for me as well. Thanks.

Is there some recipe for testing the 0002 patch? Can it be tested on an
MinGW environment, or does it need to use the MicroSoft supplied compilers?

Thanks,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2014-07-08 17:13:58 Re: postgresql.auto.conf and reload
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2014-07-08 17:11:04 Re: postgresql.auto.conf and reload